The Babadook is a difficult monster to classify as it does
not outright kill people or attempt inflict pain on others. It works in such a
way that its strengths play off of its victims weaknesses; in a sense, the
Babadook is the incarnation of ones deepest personal struggles and
vulnerabilities that manifest into a corporeal entity that will then antagonize
those it manifested itself from. Relating to this, I believe Cohen’s last
thesis, “The Monster Stands at the Threshold… of Becoming,” from his book Monster
Theory, helps to elaborate on just what makes the Babadook so monstrous.
Cohen describes in his last thesis that the monster is a
creation of our own doing that we can fight but will always return with greater
knowledge than before. This is due to the fact that if the monster truly is of
our own creation, such as Amelia creating the Babadook through her inability to
cope with her husband’s death, then the monster will always have a way to beat
us as it knows its victim as itself. Even when Amelia was able to overpower the
Babadook she didn’t actually defeat the monster, it simply retreated to a dark
corner of her basement biding its time until she becomes emotionally fragile to
strike again; or as Cohen puts it, “[t]hey can be pushed to the farthest margins
of geography and discourse... but they always return” (pg. 20). Once a monster
has been created from our own mind then there will always be that shadow of
doubt or small fear that keeps the creature alive even during the happiest of
times and once created will never fully disappear.
By relating Cohen’s monster theses one can see the different
ways many of the monsters from our society have come into being. The monsters
are not some missing link, or mutated beast, but a being of our own creation,
which makes one think, who truly is the monster?
No comments:
Post a Comment