In the original Mary Shelley
interpretation of Frankenstein, the
monster of Victor Frankenstein is depicted as a large, horrifying man sewn
together out of various dead body parts. As terrifying its appearance may be, the
monster showed signs of a rather high degree of intelligence and empathy. So why
are there so many variations of the monster in modern media that depict it as a
dumb, slow, and evil?
I have never seen the 1931 film
version of Frankenstein, but it’s
famous enough to have been referenced in several other popular media sources. The
Frankenstein monster is almost always depicted with a squared head, two bolts
attached to its neck, and walks with its hands upright. While the appearance of
the monster is free to be interpreted according to the viewers’ imaginations,
there are several other traits of the monster that has changed through the many
different versions that has made the monster very different from the one that
originated from Mary Shelley’s novel. For example, the monster from Shelley’s
book is very cunning and intelligent. It was able to evade an entire fleet of
humans that tried to track it down and kill it. It even outsmarted the
brilliant scientist and its creator, Victor Frankenstein. The monster is also
very agile and able to avoid detection from humans when it wants to. It is only
discovered by people when it wants to, such as when it tried to talk to the
family it was providing food for. The monster is also probably the most empathetic
character in the entire novel, since all it does from the moment of its
creation is to try and find a being that it can connect and relate with. While the
monster may have killed several people, all of these instances can be
considered an act of self-defense or an accident. Finally, the monster in
Shelley’s book remains nameless. All of these traits are what is lost in the modern
versions of the Frankenstein monster. It is depicted as an unintelligent,
rigid, and murderous by nature. It is essentially a zombie that is large and reanimated
by lightening striking body parts that have been sewn together. The monster is
also usually named Frankenstein for some reason as well, even though that is
the surname of its creator. The new monster barely resembles the original of
Shelley’s book. A monster changing drastically from its source material is
nothing new however. We learned in class that witches and werewolves were
significantly different from their modern versions. The Frankenstein monster
probably changed for similar reasons, such as what is relevant in the world at
the time of its creation. For example, the monster might have represented
people’s fears of scientific advancement, which is not quite relevant in modern
times. The monster might have lost all its depth and personality due to be
simpler and easier to depict in a motion picture. The monster may have lost its
humanity so that it can be easier to hate compared to the human heroes. There
are several reasons that could explain the transformation of the way the
monster acts. The reason behind the name Frankenstein being tied to the monster
is most likely due to the monster being the title character of every media it
appears in. The monster is usually the most important character of any monster
story, and the title of monster films and books usually refer to the monster
(for example, Alien, The Thing, Godzilla, etc.). Another less likely explanation
for its name is because some people may view the monster as the child/family
member of the creator, Victor Frankenstein. The monster considers Victor as its
father or at least a family in Shelley’s novel. It is understandable why many
believe that the monster is named Frankenstein instead of its creator. The
closest representation of the Frankenstein monster I can remember is oddly the
dog Sparky from the animated film, Frankenweenie.
That dog is not named Frankenstein (his creator/owner is, actually), he is
quite mobile and agile, he loves humans, and there are evil humans that want to
hurt him. Sparky of course is much better off than Shelley’s monster, since he
was created by someone who actually loves him, unlike the egomaniac Victor
Frankenstein. I am sure that there have been accurate depictions of the
original monster, but the majority of the versions only loosely represents the unnamed
monster.
No comments:
Post a Comment