Tuesday, November 17, 2015
CHAPPIE: Human or not?
A film about AI’s that has recently intrigued me is the film, Chappie. This film truly made me think about what it is to be a human. In the film a robotics scientist creates the first completely artificially intelligent program. This program acts much like a brain and can’t just function on its own so the scientist puts the program into a lifeless robotic doll. The doll then becomes aware and alive, however like a human child it knows nothing and must be taught about the world. This moment reminds me of when we talked about Descartes and dualism in class. Dualism is the belief that the mind and body are not identical. I feel like this film is parallel to the concept of dualism. The program, represents consciousness or a soul, while the lifeless doll represents the human body. This idea is further established when Chappie learns that he can encode anybody’s consciousness into a computer program. At the end of the film, Chappie encodes the scientist consciousness into a program and installs it into another lifeless doll. The scientist dies and the doll comes to life, with the same personality, and memories as the scientist. The scientist’s human body essentially dies but he lives on in the body of a robotic doll instead. This film challenges what it is to be human, is it just our consciousness that makes us humans or actually a combination of both our physical bodies and consciousness? If what makes us ‘human’ is a combination of both our physical bodies and consciousness then does that mean that people with mechanical lungs, or hearts, aren’t considered humans since they don’t have a human body in its natural state? Or if being ‘human’ is just a matter of having consciousness and not dependent on having an actual ‘human’ form than does that make Chappie a human from the start since he had consciousness in the form of a program, but just didn’t have a body. Was the program a human then? We will never know the answer because as of right now we cannot determine what ‘consciousness’ actually is. I believe that the film Chappie would argue that being human is just a matter of consciousness. If consciousness was all it took to be human, then if we can find a way to transplant our consciousness into an eternal body, like how Chappie transplanted the scientist’s consciousness into the robot doll, than humans could essentially live forever without the fear of death.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
I like your point about if being human is all about having self consciousness, then our consciousness can live forever in other medium instead of human body. But is is being a human just all about our consciousness? Then Chappie would b a "human" like us.
ReplyDeleteI am also very interest in the setting of this movie. At fist the robots were being mass produced because the success in robot policemen. They are robots that controlled by human police, they have no emotion, fearless, just like a normal robot. Chappie was one of them before he had conscious. People love those robots police and seeing them as the best invention. Till they were under controlled by the bad guy. The have no emotions, they can't think, so they do not know what is right what is wrong. However, compare to Chappie, who has his own thoughts, even he "grown up" with bunch of gangsters he still grow to figure out what was the right thing to do.
I see the Chappie is a very idealistic movie. It describes Chappie as a very not human like figure. I bet if any of the human had his power, his knowledge would like to start making robots like him and starts a robot planet.
I really liked your dualistic analysis. Chappie does hold a descartes world view with consciousness being separate from the body, which is evident when chappie downloads his mother's mind (Yolandi) into a robot at the end of the film. This really raises the question is Chappie human, and the answer logically is yes because if a humans mind can be downloaded into a robot then we can presume that chappie's mind could be downloaded into a human vessel as well. The implications are that a Cartesian world view is all that is necessary for humanity.
ReplyDelete